Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24652012-20160217005950/@comment-24652012-20160312000821

Lord of the STARS wrote: Quirkyadventures wrote: true but damn i thought my fellow kig-yar would be on my side I'm technically not on either of your sides. I think some history is stupid and should be forgotten. Results on a unarmored target:


 * penetration of scales: Yes


 * penetration of skin: Yes


 * Penetration of blubber layer: yes


 * Depth of penetration into mussel: 3/5ths an inch.


 * Visible bleeding caused: yes.


 * Results of only 1 shot: Very angry.

On a armored target:

In water armor is designed to resist againced bladed weapons wild life attacks and shrapnel, not bullets. How ever at the scale of size a bullet like that would not penetrate the armor.

On land exploration suit armor:

Would not even scratch the paint.

Best option with bullet type: full auto and run away while firing.

Major draw back: In the water bullets are slower have less range and less penetration. Best damage results are to fire up close. But dew to the swimming speed of the target they would likely get close enough to use spears swords or bubble rifles before half their health is drained. At longer ranges they likely have fire arms of their own including spearguns, rifles that fire sharp barbs or shards of glass, or in worst case scenario torpedoes.