Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-33154547-20150126113820/@comment-24750690-20150410211504

Xili Gar wrote: L377UC3 wrote: Sherlock may slowly be getting there, but I won't spoil anything.

Did you miss me?

(Shoot, I said I wouldn't spoil anything...) Don't worry, I've finished it. :P I think I know what you mean but I think you're wrong - there won't need to be a reboot of the universe or storyline for things to work in Sherlock, things can still continue from there.

Yes I missed you actually I was wondering why there were no smartass wise cracks being posted from pip boy.

I get the reference BTW ;) ALSO HE WAS MEANT TO BE DEAD HOW THIS MAKES NO SENSE pls explain ;_; No, no. That's the worst part - Moffat doesn't reboot the storyline, just the rules of the story. That means that every seasonal story arc is really just compounding the muddle of things that should have been impossible in the last story arc. Eventually, in order to get anything close to resembling a linear view of the story, you have to do twenty leaps of logic in your head before you realize why things are now the way they are, even after stuff gets rebooted. In the most abhorrent cases, it requires you to have intimate knowledge with all the nuances associated with nineteen of the twenty leaps before a basic element of the story comes close to making sense.

Sure Sherlock can keep going from where it is - until they attempt to explain why he survived. That's where Steven always falls apart, imo. His stories are the clever as hell with twists that throw your brain for a loop and all seem to be building up to some genius conclusion. In his best stories, this conclusion is genius. In his worst, Sherlock shoots a dude because he can't think of anything better to do. :/

I slumped back in my chair with my mouth gaping pretty open at that. Then I jumped up and down in my seat like a child with Stockholm syndrome directed towards his abusive father