Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-8992692-20140521131631/@comment-24750690-20140920155307

1hs444 wrote: L377UC3 wrote: That answer involves heavy levels of argument, name calling, racism, radical conservatism, radical Islam, the slightest...smallest amount of actual sanity shining through a thick skull of utter intolerance, and whether or not it's okay to keep going to war with Middle Eastern nations.

View at your own risk.

I'm genuinely sorry I just posted that link. That is actually the truth, but it's just that politians can't go right out and say HIS FAULT. x)

Bush's fault - Obama recovery - Bush's fault - Obama recovery... I think this is a bit larger than Bush or Obama. If anything, the economic policies of the past hundred years have consisted of printing more money and going to much war. There is no way in heck either of those can remain stable. I also don't think anything can really be recovered in an economy like this one. It's too volitile. Sure everything looks nice right now, but I honestly don't think Obama's made any serious headway on the larger, scarier economic probles we're facing. Problems that surpass he, Bush Junior, Clinton, Bush Senior, Reagan and even earlier presidents.

It's nothing against the prez, it's just that, the way I see it, problem is bigger than Bush and will take more than Obama to recover.

Oh gosh...I've done it. I've started the decent into political insanity. Oh Washington no!!