Board Thread:Roleplaying/@comment-17481441-20161127021251/@comment-25316824-20161205134855

(While the dialogue would be entertaining I will have to say no. His back is broken and he has a bad history with Netkak, meaning that anything he says could be construed as biased.  Keeping him in the negotiations would break logic.)

(Stonewall is both exhausting and rewarding to write.  My other characters are straight forward most of the time.  Nikolai, the strong, silent type.  Baron is angsty and seeks revenge and trust.  Stonewall, adventurer, thrill seeker, epic survivor, and storyteller who could tell you he faced 1000 Xenomorphs with a rope and sword.  He feels like he has a badass reputation to defend and so he is a dick to defend that reputation.  I guess what I am trying to say is: I almost always know how Nikolai or Baron will react to a situation before I put them in it but with Stonewall I have to put time and effort into his reaction.)

(Also it is your turn stars.)